Feature

China-US tensions are spilling into the biotech sector

The biotech sector faces another blow as US legislators take aim at Chinese-owned companies over national security concerns, writes Isaac Hanson.

US-China tensions have risen in recent years. Credit: Muhammad Farhad/Getty Images

The ongoing US-China trade war has already affected sectors from AI to agriculture and shows few signs of slowing. Now the conflict is spilling into medicine, leaving some Chinese biotechnology companies in the cold. Whilst the sector’s collaborative nature has generally protected subsidiaries operating in the US, two recent legislative moves suggest that this is changing. 

The first is a bill introduced on 25 January by two leading members of the US’ Select Committee on the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) that hopes to ban federally funded medical providers from using the services of any Chinese biotechs, particularly BGI Group, MGI and WuXi Apptec. This would effectively ban the companies from the US market. The bill argues that due to the CCP’s legal ability to view private data held by any companies based in its territory, handing over genetic data to them constitutes a national security risk. 

A Reuters investigation from 2021 shows that these fears are not entirely unfounded. BGI – formerly Beijing Genomics Institute – has been shown to work with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of China in gene sequencing, as well as storing data from millions of prenatal tests globally in China’s gene database. However, Reuters found no evidence of this data being misused, and the company has stated that it has never provided or been asked to provide genomic data to Chinese authorities. 

The question of what exactly China would do with US genomic data is open, though the bill’s proponents have some ideas. Chairman of the group Mike Gallagher suggested it could “potentially even [be used] to develop a bioweapon used to target the American people.”  

This bill was followed up on 12 February by a letter from members of the Select Committee arguing for specific sanctions against WuXi AppTec, a multinational biotech and medical devices company headquartered in Shanghai. The letter claims that the company has ties to the PLA and as such represents a threat to national security, a claim it strongly denies.  

A statement on its website states that “WuXi AppTec has a strong track record of upholding the highest intellectual property, data and privacy protection standards, as well as maintaining the trust of our customers.” The company has in the past worked with Pfizer, AstraZeneca and GSK, amongst others. 

The impact of this distrust can be felt beyond the legislative world. MGI, a Chinese company posed as an alternative to the embattled biotech Illumina, can decode a genome for around $100, according to Endpoints News. Yet the firm, headquartered in Shenzhen, is facing headwinds due to its links to BGI, the publication reports. Fears over legislation are limiting the number of labs and hospitals willing to work with the company, both for security and cost reasons.

Collaboration saves lives

A 2019 report by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission into China’s biotech development notes the potential security risks but does not view them as major concerns. On the topic of intellectual property theft, the report notes that “this reality is not limited to China […] and is generally inherent to high-innovation industries.” 

While it does recommend that the US encourage Chinese biotechs to move towards international norms in terms of data sharing, it suggests a range of options from free-trade agreements to tariffs with no mention of sanctions. 

It is also clear that the US’ biotech industry is not under threat from China given the significant gap in market size ($4.7-$6.2bn compared to $118bn) and states that “integration and collaboration run deep, and […] disrupting these linkages would bring high costs for innovation, US welfare and public health.” 

This is particularly true after a difficult year for the biotech sector in 2023. In January, GlobalData’s senior director of market research Urte Jakimaviciute commented in a press release that “biotech’s funding and investors are faced with current market uncertainty. […] There were many challenges and changes for the global economy in 2023,” and noted escalating China-West tensions as a key factor in that uncertainty. These recent moves to remove Chinese businesses from the US are likely to have a dampening effect on a market already struggling to recover.

Go to article: Home | Lula’s progress plan for Brazil: A year onGo to article: Editor's letterGo to article: ContentsGo to article: Mimotopes Company InsightGo to article: MimotopesGo to article: XylemGo to article: BriefingGo to article: News in NumbersGo to article: Latest NewsGo to article: Latest DealsGo to article: Project UpdatesGo to article: Trends & InsightGo to article: phasetwoGo to article: Datwyler Company InsightGo to article: DatwylerGo to article: In DepthGo to article: Lula’s progress plan for Brazil: A year on Go to article: How sham patents are hurting the pharma industryGo to article: Tracking the opioid lawsuit settlements amidst calls for oversight Go to article: Cell and gene therapy landscape in the USGo to article: Q&A: Cell and gene therapy value assessments need a rework to allow access Go to article: Pharmaceutical discovery through a gravitational lens Go to article: Thematic Take: ESGGo to article: Thematic Take: contentsGo to article: Foreword: A growing sense of urgency in ESG Go to article: ESG 1.0 is over – get ready for ESG 2.0 Go to article: ESG becomes mandatory: how to prepareGo to article: Theme timeline: the past, present and future of ESG Go to article: Net-zero strategies for the pharma sector Go to article: Leading pharma companies and initiatives in the race for net zeroGo to article: GlobalData’s Christopher Papadopoullos on net-zero strategy for businesses Go to article: 38% of companies lack an ESG strategy – GlobalData survey Go to article: Sustainability challenges in rare disease trials remain, but change is happeningGo to article: ESCMID 2024: The infectious consequences of climate change Go to article: Bring your own device: How patients own tech is being used in clinical trialsGo to article: Can pharma overcome generative AI’s bias problem?Go to article: China-US tensions are spilling into the biotech sector Go to article: Japanese patients among least empowered in the developed worldGo to article: World Air Quality Report: what are the health impacts and where is it worst? Go to article: Why has New Zealand U-turned on the world’s first smoking ban?Go to article: Microplastics in placentas: how serious is the problem? Go to article: Deal activity related to ESG in the pharma industry since 2021Go to article: GlobalData Thematic IntelligenceGo to article: Sponsored SupplementsGo to article: BEA TechnologiesGo to article: CytivaGo to article: ListingsGo to article: EventsGo to article: Innovation RankingsGo to article: Buyer's GuidesGo to article: Next issue