Analyst comment

Cell and gene therapy landscape in the US

GlobalData's Drugs Database reports there were 694 CGTs in development across various therapy areas as of this month.

Powered by

CGTs should require fewer doses than current long-term treatments, which could offer significant benefits for both patients and strained healthcare systems. Credit: Shutterstock/Net Vector

Cell and gene therapies (CGTs) have been gaining traction within the medical community as treatment options that are expected to replace existing lifelong treatments for the management of chronic diseases. 

Specifically, CGTs should require fewer doses than current long-term treatments, which could offer significant benefits for both patients and strained healthcare systems. 

Over the past decade, a total of 14 CGTs were approved across various therapy areas in the US. 

According to leading data and analytics company GlobalData’s Drugs Database, of these 14 therapies that were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), more than 70% were approved within the last five years (2019-2023). 

The opportunity for the approval of more CGTs remains high. According to GlobalData’s Drugs Database, there were 694 CGTs in development across various therapy areas in the US as of February 2024.

According to GlobalData’s Drugs Database, there were 694 CGTs in development across various therapy areas in the US as of February 2024.

Of these 694 CGTs, 48 assets are in late-stage development. Specifically, five assets are in preregistration and 43 assets are in Phase III development.

Previously, CGTs were viewed as promising solutions for patients with serious diseases, rare diseases, or illnesses with no available treatment options.

Now, the distribution of CGTs in late-stage development is more prevalent across several therapy areas, including cardiology, metabolic disorders, and central nervous system indications.

However, despite the robust CGT pipeline in the US, the degree to which scientific advancements in CGTs will translate into comparable progress in the US healthcare system remains uncertain, as the adoption of CGTs may be hampered by several obstacles such as concerns about clinical trials, regulatory obstacles, affordability, and access.

In the development of CGTs, challenges often arise early in the drug development process, particularly as companies advance pipeline assets to the clinical development stage where patient access and recruitment pose significant obstacles for clinical trials (NMDP, 2024).

This can be attributed to two main factors: the rarity of some of the indications being studied, which results in a small patient population that makes it difficult to achieve a large sample size, and the perception that CGTs are treatments of last resort, which dissuades patients with advanced disease from participating or remaining in trials.

Furthermore, even if companies successfully complete their clinical trial programmes and submit filings to the FDA, the regulatory landscape for CGTs may not be adequately prepared to keep pace with the rapid advancements in the field.

The high costs associated with CGTs pose a significant barrier to their adoption in the US, despite the potential therapeutic benefits they offer.

While the establishment of the Office of Therapeutic Products at the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research in March 2023 was a step towards addressing the anticipated increase in cell and gene therapy submissions, it remains unclear how the current regulatory framework will be adapted to effectively address the unique challenges introduced by CGTs (FDA, 2023).

The high costs associated with CGTs pose a significant barrier to their adoption in the US, despite the potential therapeutic benefits they offer.

The substantial production costs, particularly for gene therapy applications that require high vector doses such as those targeting skeletal muscle, contribute to these high price points (Cornetta et al, 2022).

In turn, this presents challenges to accessibility, especially within Medicaid’s current payment systems.

However, there is potential for overcoming this challenge with the introduction of bipartisan legislation such as the Medicaid Value-Based Purchasings for Patients Act (H.R. 2666), which aims to improve Medicaid patient access to new, effective, and high-cost therapies through value-based purchasing arrangements (US Library of Congress, 2023).

Cell and gene therapies are reshaping medicine by offering personalised treatments tailored to individual genetic and cellular profiles.

This approach shows promise for addressing previously challenging diseases, potentially reducing reliance on conventional treatments and improving patient outcomes.

Additionally, the regenerative potential of some therapies offers hope for conditions such as spinal cord injuries and neurodegenerative disorders.

While initial costs may be a consideration, the long-term benefits include reduced healthcare expenditures.

Ongoing research in this field holds the potential to uncover new applications and refine existing approaches, further expanding therapeutic options for patients.

According to GlobalData’s Drugs Database, there were 694 CGTs in development across various therapy areas in the US as of February 2024.

Go to article: Home | Lula’s progress plan for Brazil: A year onGo to article: Editor's letterGo to article: ContentsGo to article: Mimotopes Company InsightGo to article: MimotopesGo to article: XylemGo to article: BriefingGo to article: News in NumbersGo to article: Latest NewsGo to article: Latest DealsGo to article: Project UpdatesGo to article: Trends & InsightGo to article: phasetwoGo to article: Datwyler Company InsightGo to article: DatwylerGo to article: In DepthGo to article: Lula’s progress plan for Brazil: A year on Go to article: How sham patents are hurting the pharma industryGo to article: Tracking the opioid lawsuit settlements amidst calls for oversight Go to article: Cell and gene therapy landscape in the USGo to article: Q&A: Cell and gene therapy value assessments need a rework to allow access Go to article: Pharmaceutical discovery through a gravitational lens Go to article: Thematic Take: ESGGo to article: Thematic Take: contentsGo to article: Foreword: A growing sense of urgency in ESG Go to article: ESG 1.0 is over – get ready for ESG 2.0 Go to article: ESG becomes mandatory: how to prepareGo to article: Theme timeline: the past, present and future of ESG Go to article: Net-zero strategies for the pharma sector Go to article: Leading pharma companies and initiatives in the race for net zeroGo to article: GlobalData’s Christopher Papadopoullos on net-zero strategy for businesses Go to article: 38% of companies lack an ESG strategy – GlobalData survey Go to article: Sustainability challenges in rare disease trials remain, but change is happeningGo to article: ESCMID 2024: The infectious consequences of climate change Go to article: Bring your own device: How patients own tech is being used in clinical trialsGo to article: Can pharma overcome generative AI’s bias problem?Go to article: China-US tensions are spilling into the biotech sector Go to article: Japanese patients among least empowered in the developed worldGo to article: World Air Quality Report: what are the health impacts and where is it worst? Go to article: Why has New Zealand U-turned on the world’s first smoking ban?Go to article: Microplastics in placentas: how serious is the problem? Go to article: Deal activity related to ESG in the pharma industry since 2021Go to article: GlobalData Thematic IntelligenceGo to article: Sponsored SupplementsGo to article: BEA TechnologiesGo to article: CytivaGo to article: ListingsGo to article: EventsGo to article: Innovation RankingsGo to article: Buyer's GuidesGo to article: Next issue