The European Commission's revision of its Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Annex 1 for sterile drug products will have implications for pharmaceutical companies that market their sterile drug products in the EU, whether manufactured in the U.S. or elsewhere in the world.

It harmonizes sterile drug manufacturing principles with those of the World Health Organization (WHO) and Pharmaceutical Inspection Cooperation Scheme (PIC/S) standards of sterile drug manufacturing, as well as better aligning with the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) 2004 guidance on sterile drug products manufactured by aseptic processing.

The revision includes changes in several areas of pharmaceutical manufacturing, including risk management, personnel hygiene, environmental monitoring, and sterility assurance.

The changes include a new section on pharmaceutical quality systems, which incorporates the principles of quality risk management (QRM) into sterile drug manufacturing; a new section addressing the concept of a contamination control strategy (CCS) in reducing contamination; and sections which incorporate recent advances in sterile processing technology in manufacturing, such as restricted access barrier systems (RABS) and isolators.

This focus on contamination control and sterile processing technologies means there is likely to be an increase in demand for plug and play solutions that enable manufacturers to meet the new requirements with minimal effort.

Learn more

Go to article: Home | Digital dilemma in UK life sciences job marketGo to article: Editor's letterGo to article: ContentsGo to article: Mimotopes Company InsightGo to article: MimotopesGo to article: DatwylerGo to article: CytivaGo to article: bioMérieux Company InsightGo to article: BriefingGo to article: News in NumbersGo to article: Latest NewsGo to article: Latest DealsGo to article: Project UpdatesGo to article: Trends & InsightGo to article: PfanstiehlGo to article: SyntegonGo to article: In DepthGo to article: UK life sciences grapple with the job market’s digital dilemma Go to article: Telemedicine struggles to overcome diversity challenges in dermatology trials Go to article: Cancer treatment uncertainty: European nations struggle with drug shortages Go to article: From Europe to Latin America: Driving access to affordable biosimilars Go to article: Q&A: How the Henrietta Lacks settlement challenges biotech's view on ethics Go to article: Generative AI has the potential to revolutionise drug discovery Go to article: European PFAS ban would burden drug companies and packagers Go to article: Molnar-Institute Company InsightGo to article: Molnar-InstituteGo to article: Thematic TakeGo to article: Thematic Take: contentsGo to article: Foreword: unlocking robotics’ full potential Go to article: An introduction to robotics Go to article: A history of robotics  Go to article: The impact of robotics on the healthcare sector Go to article: Case studies: robotics in the pharmaceutical industry Go to article: Latest news: robotics in pharmaGo to article: Robotics: transforming cell and gene therapy manufacturingGo to article: Robotics innovation: Leading companies in microneedles for transdermal drug delivery Go to article: Deal activity related to robotics in the pharmaceutical industry since 2020 Go to article: Robotics hiring trends in the global pharmaceutical industry since 2020 Go to article: Robotics patent applications in the global pharmaceutical industry since 2020 Go to article: Mentions of robotics in pharmaceutical industry company filings since 2020 Go to article: GlobalData Thematic IntelligenceGo to article: Sponsored SupplementsGo to article: NiproGo to article: Watson MarlowGo to article: ListingsGo to article: EventsGo to article: AwardsGo to article: Buyer's GuidesGo to article: Next issue