Feature

eConsent in clinical trials: what’s new and what’s yet to come?

An expert panel at Medidata’s NEXT London conference discussed with Urte Fultinaviciute latest on adoption of electronic consent.

Credit: Shutterstock/Rawpixel.com

Ealectronic informed consent, also known as eConsent, aids the informed consent process by including multimedia components and digital signatures. Its time-saving and logistical advantages benefit patients, investigators, clinical trial sites, and sponsors. While this approach to clinical trial decentralisation has been a frequent topic of discussion, its widespread use is yet to flourish

The slow uptake of eConsesnt can be linked to health and competent authorities not knowing how to regulate it, Michael Tucker, managing partner of patient cloud at Dassault Systèmes, the acquirer of Medidata, tells Clinical Trials Arena on the sidelines of the Medidata NEXT London conference (March 7).

There has been a greater adoption of eConsent in the US and Canada, as these two countries have fewer regulators compared to regions like the EU.

Michael Tucker, managing partner of patient cloud at Dassault Systèmes, the acquirer of Medidata

Tucker says that there has been a greater adoption of eConsent in the US and Canada, as these two countries have fewer regulators compared to regions like the EU. However, the regulatory landscape in Europe is changing, explained Valeria Orlova, regulatory strategy analyst at Medidata, in a panel session called “Two truths and a lie: what do sites really think about eConsent?”.

Orlova noted that the EU landscape was very fragmented, but in the past few years, there has been a collaborative effort from various stakeholders in the industry. As a result, the EMA released a recommendations paper on decentralised clinical trials in late December 2022, which offers a list of requirements and acceptance of eConsent in each country.

This paper is a first step towards the unified implementation of eConsent in European trials, but Orlova noted that each country may still require a different configuration of this tool. However, sponsors should not turn their back on eConsent because of this, and should instead choose a vendor or a CRO that can take over the configuration tasks, Tucker says.

Moving forward with eConsent

While the EU regulatory landscape is clearing the path for eConsent, there are still key considerations for its optimal use. With eConsent replacing paper-based informed consent forms, it is crucial to not forget the informed aspect of the tool, Tucker says. As such, a personal interaction between the participant and investigator should be retained, whether it is an in-person visit, video call, or phone call, to verify and validate that the patient is appropriately informed. 

To seamlessly implement eConsent into clinical trials, clinicians require appropriate training material to better understand this decentralisation tool. However, vendors or sponsors should avoid providing lengthy training videos, as clinicians might not have time to watch such presentations. 

Standardisation across sites is also a pending issue. Tucker explains that some sites might insist on using eConsent tools that were developed in-house. As a result, the industry needs to do a better job of being able to integrate various systems and information sources. 

Regardless of having several unsolved problems, eConsent will become embedded into clinical trials in the next few years, Tucker says. While the use of eConsent might not be feasible in some therapy areas, such as rare diseases, it will become a standard practice in most of the larger studies. “As sponsors and sites become more comfortable with it, they will start to see the value,” he adds.

Credit: Shutterstock/IIIerlok_xolms

Go to article: Home | Nanoparticle drug delivery research gets a boostGo to article: Editor's letterGo to article: ContentsGo to article: Mimotopes Company InsightGo to article: MimotopesGo to article: BriefingGo to article: News in NumbersGo to article: Latest NewsGo to article: Latest DealsGo to article: Project UpdatesGo to article: NiproGo to article: In DepthGo to article: Covid-19 vaccine success bolsters nanoparticle drug delivery research Go to article: eConsent in clinical trials: What’s on the horizon?Go to article: Breathing easy: How digital inhalers are changing asthma treatmentGo to article: Primate models in pharma: What the future holds Go to article: A decade on, what’s next for CAR-T therapies?Go to article: FDA’s $7bn plan for 2024: Disclose CMOs, restart Cancer MoonshotGo to article: Molnar-Institute Company InsightGo to article: Molnar-InstituteGo to article: Thematic TakeGo to article: Thematic Take: contentsGo to article: ForewordGo to article: ESG is the most important theme of this decadeGo to article: A timeline of corporate ESGGo to article: The most pressing ESG concerns for the pharma industryGo to article: Key trends impacting ESG performance in the healthcare sectorGo to article: Latest news: ESG in pharmaGo to article: Sustainable supply chains: Clinical trials in a new era of limited resourcesGo to article: Increase in DPI use could lead to decreases in greenhouse gas emissionsGo to article: Environmental sustainability innovation: Leading companies in anti-malarial compositionsGo to article: Deal activity related to ESG in the pharmaceutical industry since 2020Go to article: ESG hiring trends in the global pharmaceutical industry since 2020Go to article: ESG patent applications in the global pharmaceutical industry since 2020Go to article: Mentions of ESG in pharmaceutical industry company filings since 2020 Go to article: GlobalData Thematic IntelligenceGo to article: Pharma Sponsored SupplementsGo to article: CfPIEGo to article: ListingsGo to article: EventsGo to article: RankingsGo to article: Buyer's GuidesGo to article: Next issue